<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Database Schemas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.usepowershell.com/2009/02/comparing-database-schemas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.usepowershell.com/2009/02/comparing-database-schemas/</link>
	<description>The Shell Is Calling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:24:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan</title>
		<link>http://blog.usepowershell.com/2009/02/comparing-database-schemas/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 08:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usepowershell.com/?p=43#comment-543</guid>
		<description>Nothing comes close to SQL in my opinion.  Even of all the different flavors I find there are fine details that make it difficult to say one is better than the other.

How about Powershell with it&#039;s piping, filtering, compare and selecting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing comes close to SQL in my opinion.  Even of all the different flavors I find there are fine details that make it difficult to say one is better than the other.</p>
<p>How about Powershell with it&#8217;s piping, filtering, compare and selecting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://blog.usepowershell.com/2009/02/comparing-database-schemas/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 02:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.usepowershell.com/?p=43#comment-80</guid>
		<description>You know, the thing about SQL is, that there is virtually nothing that can replace it. 

Does anyone know if a substitute exists for sql? I mean besides MS SQL and Oracle and all that jazz. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, the thing about SQL is, that there is virtually nothing that can replace it. </p>
<p>Does anyone know if a substitute exists for sql? I mean besides MS SQL and Oracle and all that jazz. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

